The case involved a request

As we have seen throughout the article, there are several free and paid courses on branding, offering everything from basic notions to more advanc techniques for building and managing brands.

Now that you have a broader view of the topic, don’t let your learning remain on paper .

Apply what you learn chile phone number library  in the courses to improve your brand and make it more competitive. As an agency specializ in branding , we believe that a well-structur brand is one of a company’s greatest assets. It can generate significant results and boost the growth of your business.

Invest in your learning  The case

 

Contact us and find out how our branding services can help improve your brand’s positioning in the market .

On November 15th of last year, Dr. Roger O’Keefe (Cambridge University) gave a very interesting talk at Oxford University titl “Immunities and Extradition: The Curious Case of Khurts Bat”. I was not there, but benefitt from Oxford University’s excellent podcast system (podcast of talk available here).

 

As Dr. O’Keefe  how the service works explain, the talk develop views he had already.  Express in a case note he had written for the British Yearbook of International Law. The case in question was Khurts Bat v Investigating Judge of the German Feral Court, [2011] EWHC 2029 (Admin).

 

 

Germany for the extradition, from

 

UK, of Mr Khurts Bat, head of the Office of National  agb directory Security of Mongolia. He was sought on account of crimes he supposly committ in Germany, particularly the kidnapping, imprisonment and questioning of a Mongolian national. In the extradition proceings before the English court,

Mongolia attempt to prevent the extradition of her official by invoking two types of immunity, both of which fail. First, Mongolia reli on personal/ status immunity or immunity ratione personae on the basis that defendant was said to be a member of a Special Mission sent by Mongolia to the UK and also by virtue of Mr.

Bat’s position as “a very senior governmental officer.” Secondly Mongolia reli on subject-matter immunity or immunity ratione materiae, arguing that the acts in respect of which Khurts Bat was accus in Germany were committ on behalf of Mongolia.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top